Smartphone camera vs Canon 650D with shocking result

There should be no question that any modern dslr can outperform a smartphone or point and shoot under similar circumstances. The OP's original shots don't show this, in fact they weren't even taken at the same time  ... two minutes apart ... so the lighting may have  changed between shots.

A better comparison would be not only jpeg to jpeg, but one which used the dslr's built in presets, which let the camera optimize settings for a given situation. Then, shooting at the same time, we can see what the in camera processing does with each sensor. For a true comparison, we can then crop the images and do some pixel peeping to see what's really there. One should not have to shoot raw, then post process and convert to jpeg in order to replicate the apparent quality of an instant smartphone snapshot. I shoot both raw and jpeg, and the vast majority of my out of camera jpeg shots are much better than anything I can get from any of my p&s cameras or smartphones. Yes, I have done some excellent work with non-dslr cameras, but I recognize their limitations and sweet spots and adjust my work accordingly.

I also know that many people just take pictures, and have no interest in photography. They just want to document and share, and have absolutely no concept of the art of photography. That's fine, and those people are well served by their smartphones which, at this point, have become the compact camera of choice. The claim that a smartphone is somehow a "better" camera than a dslr, however, falls into that general category of alternate facts.