Full-framer logic

Snip

" has nothing to do with which is "better" or preffered. I am only highlighting the differences. It is up to the user to decide what their priorit is are. You started this thread with the misplace notion that all ff users are zealots. Hogwash. Same as all m4/3 users are not fact ignoring trolls. Both of those two do tend to be the loudest on here. Most of the rest of us understand the differences.

It seems that in some ways we are in violent agreement.

Agreement yes. Violent?

I know quite well that they will have visual differences, but, for me, I start with my exposures, and, work from there.

Well I actually start with field of view

While issues such as DOF are important, they come in the category of my third set of factors, and, I think for most people, the first two dominate.

Agreedish.  Nowhere did I ever rank differences. My rank would be FOV, actually I went back and forth about aperture vs exposure but they interplay so much that I couldn't rank them. Sometimes you care more about shutter speed. Sometimes you care more about aperture as relates to DOF. So personally I couldn't rank them 1 thru 3. Do you have a ranking?

And, as it happens, it provides a good basis for seeing whether or not noise at specific iso's is going to be acceptable.

Something seems lost in translation here........

However, it's a good idea to read a whole post before commenting..

I actually do read the entire post before responding. Sometimes more than once. Then I respond in line if a conversation has multiple points. I am no forum pro but I have found this method avoids a lot of unnecessary confusion. It is easier to know exactly what someone is reporting to.

-- hide signature --

karl reed

Personally I am not very skilled at intenet communications perhaps if I know text is misplaced I should fix it correctly rather than just add a note in the future.