OP
(unknown member)
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 12,354
Re: Love your review
The Davinator wrote:
absquatulate wrote:
The Davinator wrote:
mxx wrote:
And thumbs down to all the critics whose cameras probably produces inferior picture quality to the Sigmas. Boy, are we a sour bunch on DPR, not allowing anyone to enjoy his/her choice of camera.
Not sour...realistic. A camera that was average or poor in 4 out of 7 categories cannot be given a final rating of 5/5. That is ridiculous...and you obviously missed that point.
How about you pay attention to what a professional fine art photographer says?different camera (actually inferior in several respects) but the exact same sensor.
http://www.roundeyegallery.com/blog?tag=sigma+quattro
But let me guess, it doesn't shoot 8 fps+ plus so its crap.....
The review is on this camera. A camera that rates average to weak in 4/7 categories is not a 5/5. No review site would ever give that rating.
Categories that are irrelevant to what this camera is actually designed to do.
I am paying attention...your link and comments about a professional (I was a wedding and portrait photographer for nearly 25 years...so spare me) is completely irrelevant to the discussion. I dont need 8fps....and I also dont need your clueless, ignorant, uniformed sarcasm.
The only uninformed person here is someone who thinks that a camera that is designed to be shot for specific things should be marked against things it clearly wasn't designed to do. No-one who has a hole in their backside buys this camera for sports, or for bifs or for lowlight shooting, it would be like buying a car for sailing, I'm not sure which part of that you're missing. Anyone with half a clue knows what these cameras are good at and what they are not, it's the worst kept secret since since Barry Manilow announced he was gay.
I presume you would give someone who scored 58% on an exam an "A"
I presume you would buy a car to go sailing in....