DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Panasonic DFD

Started Apr 15, 2017 | Questions thread
Jon555 Veteran Member • Posts: 7,722
Re: Video AF is not stills AF!

Rosetta wrote:

IMHO most replies above - while going to a lot of detail - are looking into the wrong direction. The OP is considering Pana for its video features. Hence what matters is also video AF performance with different lenses and this is a totally different game than AF performance for stills (which is for the most part good enough in either case).

Actually if judged on the one dozen or so posts in this forum from the last couple of days alone GH5 video AF performance leaves a few things to be desired, and this is based on tests using PL lenses. So whether Oly lenses make it much worse was not a question so far.

My advice to the OP is to think twice about whether you will actually deploy the GH5's extra capabilities in video - do you have the intent, time and infrastructure to work with 10bit 4K 60fps 400MBS material for grading before scaling it all down to a format that can be consumed today?

The GH5 is a great camera (I own it) but it may not be what gives you the biggest benefit for the money today.

As I've said previously I think it's brave to rely on the GH5's video AF for anything you can't repeat. I found this showed the issues quite well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE9SbpVnrss&t=1536s
I do think low light and fairly close distances are the biggest issues.

 Jon555's gear list:Jon555's gear list
Nikon Coolpix 950 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Sony RX100 V Canon EOS 5DS R Panasonic GH5 +31 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow