DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

crazy question how does the 16-55 f2.8 compare to the 50mm f2?

Started Mar 25, 2017 | Discussions thread
georgehudetz Veteran Member • Posts: 6,299
Re: crazy question how does the 16-55 f2.8 compare to the 50mm f2?

Truman Prevatt wrote:

DrNeil wrote:

yes id not really considered weight. but i guess it replaces carrying 2-3 primes..

If we do a bean count on weight - between 16 and 50 Fuji has a few primes. One probably would not want to carry all of them. Why carry an 18, 23 and 27? A 23 and 35 are quite close in reality - about a step or two. So unless you are really interesting in the lower range a 23 f2 (which I think you have) and 50 would and a step or two would do it. So the two lenses are probably together 1/2 the weight of the brick and both are one stop faster (on ASP-C 2.8 is quite slow) not to mention the bird is about 2K.

Zoom lenses are over sold - they make the camera makers lots of money.

Take a look at the statistics relative to what lenses people use to take pictures - at least, pictures that are posted on-line, and you will see that if anything, primes lenses are oversold.

The vast majority of images made with DSLRs are with zoom lenses.

 georgehudetz's gear list:georgehudetz's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Panasonic S 24-105mm F4 Macro OIS Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Panasonic Lumix S Pro 16-35mm F4 +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow