DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

16-45 vs 16-85 (in the 16-45 range)

Started Feb 7, 2017 | Discussions thread
Nicols Contributing Member • Posts: 870
Re: 16-45 vs 16-85 (in the 16-45 range)

I am happy with my copy of the 16-45, too.

I returned the first one I received because there was a lot of wobbling of the front part, and the edges were never sharp.

The second copy I am still using is good. No wobbling, and sharp from edge to edge. And still fine after 5 years of use.

I bought it in 2011 for 199€. Great value, especially for this price.

I don't have the 16-85. I am a bit tempted. But as I have several lenses in the longer range (A50/1,4 DA 70/2,4 F 100/2,8 macro, Tokina ATX-pro 28-70/2.8), it is no really necessary. Might be practical in some situations, avoiding lens changes. For the time being I will stick to what I have.

Best regards

Klaus

kh1234567890 wrote:

Maybe I have an unusual copy

 Nicols's gear list:Nicols's gear list
Pentax K10D Pentax K-5 Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA 16-45mm F4 ED AL Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM +17 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow