Newbie Olympus Lenses

Sami k wrote:

Hi

I am looking to switching to Micro4/3, I currently have an entry level Dslr and instead of investing into higher end ones, I prefer the lighter weight of the micro4/3.

looking at the em1 markii with either the 12-100 f4 or the 12-40 f2.8

i mostly shoot landscapes and outdoors, rarely indoors.

I have read all the topics about people trading their 12-40 for a 12-100, but as a new buyer do u think it is better to invest into the 12-100 for my type of photography or is the 12-40 a lot better, again mostly landscape so the f2.8 will not make a big difference for me and I like the extra reach and not having to switch lenses.

if i get the 12-100 I will probably get the 300mm f4

if I get the 12-40, I will probably need the 40-150 f2.8 AND the 300 f4,

so dollar wise the 12-100 option is better providing the quality is close

please be gentle, I am new

thanks guys

Gentle it is.

I own the 12-40 f/2.8, the 12-100 f/4 and the 40-150 f/2.8. I also have the 1.4 teleconverter that works with the 40-150 f/2.8. That gets me to 210mm. I also enjoy photographing the outdoors and wildife, and as such find use for all three.

As a start out, the 12-100 f/4 is a good choice, I have been impressed with the clarity and sharpness it delivers, though I admit I do not pixel peep it to death either. All the best in whatever you decide.

I used the 300 f/4 when I was in southern Africa this past May.  For wildlife, that lens is stunning.  I have not purchased a copy in as much while it would be good for that here in Colorado, when it comes to landscapes or even street scapes, I have never missed not having it.