Pentax lens selection

Alex Sarbu wrote:

Harold66 wrote:

To complete on what I wrote

the Pentax K70 +16-85mm is 1,176 grs . The Olympus Em-5 II with the new Zuiko 4/12-100 is not only 100 grs lighter but is brighter and covers focal length up to 200mm ( in 35mm equivalent) instead of 130mm for the Pentax

Well, a DSLR kit would be doubly penalized in such a comparison - first, the camera is larger due to having a mirror box, then the lens is larger because it needs to be a retrofocus design.

YES EXACTLY . this is why I think if lots of travel is involded and/or the OP prefers to use to compose with a 4/3 ratio, the Olympus might be a better option

They are both weather sealed and both featured high res mode which is very useful for still landscapes shot with a tripod

You should mention the prices, too The EM-5 II is $900 ($1100 at launch), while the K-70 is $620 ($650 at launch, it's a newer camera); but the biggest difference is with lenses: while the Pentax 16-85 is a $520 lens, the Olympus 12-100 is more than double - $1300.

Indeed but to be fair the 12-100 is much more pro lens than the 16-85mm. the olympus 12-50mm or the panasonic 12-60mm are more direct competitors to the 16-85mm and the Panasonic is actually a bit cheaper

so if the OP buys the Panasonic lens new and the em5 used the price difference would be minimal

OTOH, higher prices won't bring you smaller DSLR cameras and lenses. But saving up $1060 might make the DSLR easier to lug around.

Weight is weight regardless of the price and buying used is an option. Maybe the difference in budget is a problem for the OP, maybe not

But as someone wrote maybe the OP  already bought the K70, in which case this is more useful for someone else reading this thread

Harold