Exciting Pana announcements, especially for video people.

Jorginho wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

Another interesting fact is the size/weight of the new GH5.

GH5 138.5 x 98.1 x 87.4 mm and 725gr.

NX1 is 138.5x102.3x65.8 mm (or 14.0 x 10.2 x 6.6 cm in other measurements) and 550grs.

And for comparison, Nikon D750 140.5x113x78 mm, 840grams.

I understand that it is a semi pro (or pro) video orientated camera, but the increase in size and weight is substantial; main reason should be IBIS and special cooling system for the in-camera processing and recording, still, m4/3 is reaching dSLR territory.

No it is not. It does not let quality suffer under size like Sony seems to do. There was a clear wish among videographers to have a cam like the GH5. Fine. You want a cam that warms your hands in winter and cook eggs in summer? Make it in a small package. But Panasonic is about quality and durability. Try to find one GH4 on the mFT that broke down. It might be there, I do not read all threads but these are very few and far between. Overheating has never been recorded (in 4K hehe).

If you want a similar setup with an APS-c sensor let alone FF...we all know what would happen. I would be enormous. IBIS heats things up and 400 Mbps in 4K...well...

We can see m43s is not approaching some certain size by simply looking at GX80, GF9, EPL8 and especially GM5 (where is GM6 though). Especially the latter of course is of a size no DSLR APS-c can even come remotely close to.

But this is your typical cherrypicking: we pick one model., we mention size and weight and...done. Too funny.

I do not understand your comment at all.

Maybe you do not comprehend the English language well enough to have a constructive conversation.

First of all, I truly respect Panasonic, and I said that it is the only system I could have been in right now, if not for the NX. I say that Panasonic cares about their customers and respect their money, and they will deliver an excellent workhorse. It seems like you are not reading, at all, just want to talk, and wisdom is in the hearing.

FF with IBIS is 126.9 x 95.7 x 59.7 mm and 556gr, it is called A7ii, you do not have to imagine things that do exist. Another one: 116.8 x 68.6 x 38.1 mm and 627grs with battery and memory card, that is called A7sII.

NX1 is MY main camera, D750 is the usual camera we are shooting stills with the people I work with, and GH5 is the camera we are talking in this thread. One is the camera we care here in the SAMSUNG NX FORUM, D750 is one of the best selling full frame cameras and I know very well (it could have been the 6D I use a lot, 14.5 x 11.2 x 7.1 cm/770grams), and GH5 is the subject of this thread. Seriously, what is your point? Isn't the GH5 a m4/3 camera that reaches Full frame size and weight? Did I say it is a bad thing? I just state the facts scientifically, not randomly and unsubstantialy.

and I quote my self, because you can't read well enough, and you have to re-read the WORDS,

"I understand that it is a semi pro (or pro) video orientated camera, but the increase in size and weight is substantial; main reason should be IBIS and special cooling system for the in-camera processing and recording, still, m4/3 is reaching dSLR territory."

and I started the thread with "Another interesting fact is the size/weight of the new GH5." and I gave some examples.

Was I offending in anyway to m4/3???

You are nuts..