OP
Kisaha
•
Senior Member
•
Posts: 2,300
Re: a6500 weights 453 g...
flip 21 wrote:
between 1000€ and 1300€. I can go 1500€, if it was the GH5, and came with the kit lens included...
If the A6500 had a a Samsung NX 500 kind of LCD screen (wich tilts 180º), shoot 4K at 60p, and had the same price (1400€), I would buy it... well I'm assuming it doesn't overheats like the A6300... right?
But right now, I'm crazy about the GH5... I just love it
I also Love my Nx500. but I'm really mad with Samsung.... Guys, it is one year, and they didn' give us any kind of explanation... you just don't do this to your consumers... namely the ones like Kisaha and Tecnoworld... they worship you
Companies are looking at the big picture flip, not what individual users wants or needs, especially what you want for that money, and I am looking for whatever best for me, and Sony, right now, isn't.
You want to pay 1000 euros less, for a camera that will be out in 4-5 months time in Portugal, it offers the most that any other camera (after the GH4, the NX1) have ever offer, for a very reasonable, if not cheap price. Do you know how silly you sound to people, not with photo and video knowledge, but with a little bit of common sense?
Have you heard about Ken Rockwell? Well, listen to him..
"Get a DSLR like the Nikons or Canons for serious shooting, or to save money.
Nikon and Canon DSLRs take better pictures, at least if you're as critical about color rendition as I am. They also handle faster, have much better battery life, and cost less for the same features. By the time you spend as much as an a6300 for a DSLR, you're getting a very fancy DSLR. A basic DSLR like the Nikon D3300 or Canon SL1 costs only one-third as much as this A6300, and takes pictures at least as good. Basic DSLRs are also not much bigger or heavier than the A6300.
The A6300 is the girl you date for fun and good times until you find something better, while a DSLR is the woman you marry for a lifetime of serious pursuits. The A6300 is easy and fun, while a DSLR makes better pictures if you're serious beyond just posting on Facebook to be forgotten in a day."
and listen to this one as well..
"Sony and Fuji are completely different from each other:
Ergonomics
Fuji's cameras are designed by and for real photographers. Fuji cameras have far superior ergonomics, with real shutter, aperture, exposure compensation and other dials.
Sony's cameras have the world's worst menu systems, and then they force you to into menus and screens to set the most basic things like ISO and shutter speeds.
Sonys are designed for and by amateurs and online tweakers who don't actually know what's important in a camera.
Quality
Fuji, like Canon, makes almost all of its cameras and lenses domestically in Japan.
Sony usually offshores its cameras — even the $3,200 made-in-Thailand A7R II — to whatever country can do it the cheapest."