Upgrading from a Rebel T3i to T6s~Upgrade the lens? Wildlife shooting is the goal.

SeeTheWorld wrote:

SeeTheWorld wrote:

AdriaanMeijer wrote:

(...)
The fact that you are happy with the results of your lenses ('some nice wildlife shots') makes me thinking to advise you to be reluctant in buying an other lens. And if you'd go for an upgrade, then the question is what for? more reach? more IQ? Better IS? faster aperture? For birding lenses reaching to at least 400mm or more are desirable.

(...)
And do consider weight of equipment when walking with your lenses.

Adriana,

Thank you for the clear and witty response. Why would I change lenses? For a better keep ratio. I know 400 is better for BIF. But, I'm too constricted when carrying big lenses. So, I count on megapixels. I hear you saying megapixels aren't necessarily the answer. That's why one of my considerations is looking at the non-L new 70-300 lens. I think is has an improved IS, and it is not as heavy as the L. The ideal would be a light 2.8 400 mm with IS, but that hasn't been invented yet. I'm glad to hear your comments on dual body. I think a Rick Steves day pack will help with the added weight. I'm actually very excited by the prospect of not having to change lenses in a pinch. Any thoughts on the 70-300 II? Thanks again.

I haven't done enough research on these lenses to give reasonable advise. Do some research yourself. A place to start is 'better keep ratio'. Do investigate what went wrong with the non keepers. That's the problem to tackle.
I did give the list of questions for a reason.

Mary
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world . . ." Margaret Mead

Sorry Adriaan. Spell check mangeled your name.

is okay. I tend to sign mails with Adriana time and again.