DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Not quite there

Started Mar 4, 2016 | User reviews thread
hotdog321
hotdog321 Forum Pro • Posts: 21,141
Re: Not quite there

diness wrote:

hotdog321 wrote:

How is the edge sharpness at f/2.8 compared to the previous versions? That was a major plus with the 16-35 f/4L IS as opposed to previous f/2.8 versions.

Hey Craig, just note, he is reviewing the 16-35 ii, not the new iii version. I believe you owned the version ii at one point right?

Oh, thanks. Totally overlooked that--I just "assumed." Sloppy reading on my part.

I used the old version 1 for many years and never bothered with the version II since it really wasn't a major upgrade. When the f/4 IS version came out and I jumped on it. Man, it blew the old version 1 out of the water!

-- hide signature --
 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow