70-300 IS vs. 70-200 F4L: My Conclusion

Started Oct 25, 2005 | Discussions thread
Spotted Cow Senior Member • Posts: 1,475
Re: 70-300 IS vs. 70-200 F4L: My Conclusion

Blokfluitist wrote:

Well... I traded in my 70-200 f/4 for the 70-300L last year and my experience is that the 70-300 is not only sharp but has better contrast and colour than the 70-200. I also have the 100-400 m2 but that's just not a carry-around lens. I am really impressed with the 70-300 and don't miss the 70-200 at all. I'm getting shots I would have missed and I'm not having to crop.


I think the OP, from almost 11 years ago, is comparing the non-L 70-300mm with the 70-200 f4L. 100-400mm MKII was not even a pipe dream back then.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow