Sigma 150-600mm Sport for Nikon

DMKAlex

Veteran Member
Messages
7,630
Solutions
7
Reaction score
3,847
Location
Fairfield County, CT, US
I ordered one through my connection. Got it at a very good price and I wasn't sure that it was not gray. I logged on to Sigma USA's website and created an account and registered the lens with the serial number. It went through and acknowledge that I've got the extended warranty (3 years, 11 months, 28 days).

I got it for the price of the gray selling on eBay. I am pretty happy with the saving.

Took it out to tested it and here's my preliminary impression so far:

1. This thing is gigantic, huge.

2. It is very heavy. Definitely not something to hand hold, or dangle around your neck or shoulder.

3. It is well built with a lot of controls and metal.

4. The OS (optical stablization) works very well (I tried that on a monopod).

5. The ultrasonic motor drive for focus is fast and precise, a lot faster than my older 80-400mm Nikon.

I took a few snaps at max. 600mm with the monopod, the image is crystal tack sharp.

Now, I just have to get used to using this huge lens. And I am now wondering if I should sell my 80-400mm Nikon, which is still good for walking around.

I also am looking for a dolly arrangement to carry this gigantic new lens.
 
I have both of these lenses too. I wanted an affordable way to reach 600mm so I bought the Sigma S with every intention of selling my 80-400. The problem is that the 80-400 is so versatile that I can't give it up. It's light (compared to the Sigma) and is an excellent walk around lens. I really like the fact that I have 80mm on the short end and find that often I can get away with just this one lens when I'm out and about. Besides I'm really impressed with my 80-400 on my D500.

Archie
 
This is what I use (using black rapid curve strap now though instead of the custom one shown).
saaber1 said:
Tord, re handholding/portability I would suggest using a black rapid type strap (around your shoulder) attached to the original lens foot. If you use a short monopod like the 14" siruii carbon fiber one shown in the pic below, you can leave the monopod and the strap attached all the time.

Here are the benefits of this carry system (I am not selling anything! : ) ):

1) Weight is spread around your shoulder, not your neck

2) Lens lays at your side at it's center of gravity (parallel to the ground) thus is very stable and reluctant to inadvertently swing (think of a gimbal mount which is also stable due to being at the center of gravity)

3) Lens can easily be swung behind you when going through heavy brush

4) Since monopod is already attached, you can grab it as a vertical grip at any time

5) If you carry with monopod slightly extended, you can swing the camera up and put the base of the monopod at/on top of your belt giving you an ultra steady handheld position

6) you can carry the monopod fully extended, meaning you don't have to collapse it all the time. If used according to the pic below, the lens hangs parrallel to the ground while the monopod is perpendicular to the ground and behind your back. Thus it doesn't matter if it's 5 feet long, you can leave it extended and it won't get in your way (it will look a bit strange to others though ha ha).

7) If you carry the monopod fully extended you can swing the whole thing up to shoot and set the monopod on the ground. No need to attach or detach monopod or tripod. You are ready to shoot at any time.

If you carry this way it's a total breeze.

 
Thanks for the heads up! I was able to register a lens I purchased last year!


John
 
Thanks for the heads up! I was able to register a lens I purchased last year!

John
Was the lens gray market? Otherwise, why would you question if you could register it?
 
USA lenses, but just way past the typical 30-90 registration period.
 
I ordered one through my connection. Got it at a very good price and I wasn't sure that it was not gray. I logged on to Sigma USA's website and created an account and registered the lens with the serial number. It went through and acknowledge that I've got the extended warranty (3 years, 11 months, 28 days).

I got it for the price of the gray selling on eBay. I am pretty happy with the saving.

Took it out to tested it and here's my preliminary impression so far:

1. This thing is gigantic, huge.

2. It is very heavy. Definitely not something to hand hold, or dangle around your neck or shoulder.

3. It is well built with a lot of controls and metal.

4. The OS (optical stablization) works very well (I tried that on a monopod).

5. The ultrasonic motor drive for focus is fast and precise, a lot faster than my older 80-400mm Nikon.

I took a few snaps at max. 600mm with the monopod, the image is crystal tack sharp.

Now, I just have to get used to using this huge lens. And I am now wondering if I should sell my 80-400mm Nikon, which is still good for walking around.

I also am looking for a dolly arrangement to carry this gigantic new lens.
Funny, I do not find it all that hard to hand hold, though I often use it with a monopod or tripod. By the way, I find the strap that comes with the lens works well for me.
 
Funny, I do not find it all that hard to hand hold, though I often use it with a monopod or tripod. By the way, I find the strap that comes with the lens works well for me.

--
bmw
I agree. I have used mine in the field over 300 days now with a typical day being 5 hours and about 5 miles of hiking. I shoot almost entirely handheld. I can easily hold this lens on target for longer than I can stand to look through a viewfinder. It is nowhere near too heavy to handhold.

I am also still using the strap that came with the lens. It works.
 
I recently bought a Sun-Sniper strap, which you connect with the 'Rotable' connector to the lens-foot (not use a strap connected to the camera, the lens is to heavy for that!). You carry the lens+camera up-site-down.

This kind of strap (you have others with the same construction) makes carrying so much easier!
 
I ordered one through my connection. Got it at a very good price and I wasn't sure that it was not gray. I logged on to Sigma USA's website and created an account and registered the lens with the serial number. It went through and acknowledge that I've got the extended warranty (3 years, 11 months, 28 days).

I got it for the price of the gray selling on eBay. I am pretty happy with the saving.

Took it out to tested it and here's my preliminary impression so far:

1. This thing is gigantic, huge.
Yup!
2. It is very heavy. Definitely not something to hand hold, or dangle around your neck or shoulder.
Some do, I don't.
3. It is well built with a lot of controls and metal.
Yup!
4. The OS (optical stablization) works very well (I tried that on a monopod).
I found my results were better with it off, when used with a tripod, but I use it mostly on CX cameras, where even minute shakes can mess things up (it is then equiv. to a 1.6 meter lens, or with the TC on, a 2.3 m / 7 ft lens!).
5. The ultrasonic motor drive for focus is fast and precise, a lot faster than my older 80-400mm Nikon.

I took a few snaps at max. 600mm with the monopod, the image is crystal tack sharp.

Now, I just have to get used to using this huge lens. And I am now wondering if I should sell my 80-400mm Nikon, which is still good for walking around.
I sold mine before getting the Sigma Sport, something I have not regretted.

The TC-1401 (that is made for this lens and the new 120-300/2.8) is an excellent add-on!
I also am looking for a dolly arrangement to carry this gigantic new lens.
It fits, with the lens shade mounted, in a ThinkTank Airport Takeoff, which is an excellent bag to roll behind you, or carry on your back, if you prefer that.
 
I have the "C" version and it does a very nice job, even at 600mm. For short shooting periods, I just handhold, but if I'm going to be shooting for a long time, I take the ole' monopod with me. With that beastie you have, a monopod will be your best friend! :-) Looking forward to seeing some of your images.

David
 
If you contact Sigma and tell them there is something wrong the very first thing they will ask is for receipt. And receipt has to be from an authorized dealer. That is how you get 4 year warranty. If you send the lens in you have to accompany it with the receipt.
 
I have a chance to truely tested this lens today. Went to the zoo for some easy targets.

The pros:

1. This lens is supper sharp.

2. The auto focus is so good that it is jaw dropping fast and accurate. The ultra sonic motor is just great. Fast and quiet. It is also extremely accurate. I don't know this is what you should expect in the newer technology (newer lenses). It is so perfect I was lead to believe that there is some kind of computer logic or algorithm that aided the fucus. It seems to be very smart to guess where I want the focus.

The cons:

1. The brightness. That f/6.3 is very noticeably darker than my Nikon 80-400mm f/5.6. I tested this indoor in the bird house where it was dark and I had to strain my eyes when I tried out the manual focusing. I don't know if this is something that would be offset by the excellent auto focus (as I mentioned in the pros section) that I would not need to manual focus as much.

2. The weight. Maybe this is just a natural property of a big lens. For those who claim you can hand hold this lens, you must be one of the Mario brothers. I took it off my monopod and I lasted about 10 minutes when my left arm went numb.

I have yet to test it on BIF shoot but I ran out of time this afternoon.

My preliminary report is that this is an excellent addition to those who want to shoot birds, wildlifes and sport actions. But be prepared to use it on a good heavy duty monopod.

Sigma 150-600mm Sport

Sigma 150-600mm Sport
 
Last edited:
I have a chance to truely tested this lens today. Went to the zoo for some easy targets.

The pros:

1. This lens is supper sharp.

2. The auto focus is so good that it is jaw dropping fast and accurate. The ultra sonic motor is just great. Fast and quiet. It is also extremely accurate. I don't know this is what you should expect in the newer technology (newer lenses). It is so perfect I was lead to believe that there is some kind of computer logic or algorithm that aided the fucus. It seems to be very smart to guess where I want the focus.

The cons:

1. The brightness. That f/6.3 is very noticeably darker than my Nikon 80-400mm f/5.6. I tested this indoor in the bird house where it was dark and I had to strain my eyes when I tried out the manual focusing. I don't know if this is something that would be offset by the excellent auto focus (as I mentioned in the pros section) that I would not need to manual focus as much.

2. The weight. Maybe this is just a natural property of a big lens. For those who claim you can hand hold this lens, you must be one of the Mario brothers. I took it off my monopod and I lasted about 10 minutes when my left arm went numb.

I have yet to test it on BIF shoot but I ran out of time this afternoon.

My preliminary report is that this is an excellent addition to those who want to shoot birds, wildlifes and sport actions. But be prepared to use it on a good heavy duty monopod.

Sigma 150-600mm Sport

Sigma 150-600mm Sport
We are no the same wavelength, that's for sure: A sturdy monopod, or a heavy-duty tripod with a good head, that's essential for me. On tripod you should set the OS to off, or you can get into problems.

--
Tord_2 (at) photographer (dot) net
Mostly Nikon V1, V2, J5, & D600, user
 
Forgot, nice shot!
 
I have a chance to truely tested this lens today. Went to the zoo for some easy targets.

The pros:

1. This lens is supper sharp.

2. The auto focus is so good that it is jaw dropping fast and accurate. The ultra sonic motor is just great. Fast and quiet. It is also extremely accurate. I don't know this is what you should expect in the newer technology (newer lenses). It is so perfect I was lead to believe that there is some kind of computer logic or algorithm that aided the fucus. It seems to be very smart to guess where I want the focus.

The cons:

1. The brightness. That f/6.3 is very noticeably darker than my Nikon 80-400mm f/5.6. I tested this indoor in the bird house where it was dark and I had to strain my eyes when I tried out the manual focusing. I don't know if this is something that would be offset by the excellent auto focus (as I mentioned in the pros section) that I would not need to manual focus as much.

2. The weight. Maybe this is just a natural property of a big lens. For those who claim you can hand hold this lens, you must be one of the Mario brothers. I took it off my monopod and I lasted about 10 minutes when my left arm went numb.

I have yet to test it on BIF shoot but I ran out of time this afternoon.

My preliminary report is that this is an excellent addition to those who want to shoot birds, wildlifes and sport actions. But be prepared to use it on a good heavy duty monopod.

Sigma 150-600mm Sport

Sigma 150-600mm Sport
Just wanted to add a comment on versatility of this lens.

With its weight and bulk, this is definitely a special purpose lens. You take it when you go to Yellow Stone, or go to shoot birds in flight. It is definitely not something you hang around your neck and walk around with. You need to have the dolly to haul it around.

My original intend, or my question, was to replace the 80-400mm with this. Now I have a chance to test it, and loving it, it is definitely no replacement of the good old favorite 80-400mm in terms of versatility and walking-around-with.
 
I have a chance to truely tested this lens today. Went to the zoo for some easy targets.

The pros:

1. This lens is supper sharp.

2. The auto focus is so good that it is jaw dropping fast and accurate. The ultra sonic motor is just great. Fast and quiet. It is also extremely accurate. I don't know this is what you should expect in the newer technology (newer lenses). It is so perfect I was lead to believe that there is some kind of computer logic or algorithm that aided the fucus. It seems to be very smart to guess where I want the focus.

The cons:

1. The brightness. That f/6.3 is very noticeably darker than my Nikon 80-400mm f/5.6. I tested this indoor in the bird house where it was dark and I had to strain my eyes when I tried out the manual focusing. I don't know if this is something that would be offset by the excellent auto focus (as I mentioned in the pros section) that I would not need to manual focus as much.

2. The weight. Maybe this is just a natural property of a big lens. For those who claim you can hand hold this lens, you must be one of the Mario brothers. I took it off my monopod and I lasted about 10 minutes when my left arm went numb.

I have yet to test it on BIF shoot but I ran out of time this afternoon.

My preliminary report is that this is an excellent addition to those who want to shoot birds, wildlifes and sport actions. But be prepared to use it on a good heavy duty monopod.

Sigma 150-600mm Sport

Sigma 150-600mm Sport
Just wanted to add a comment on versatility of this lens.

With its weight and bulk, this is definitely a special purpose lens. You take it when you go to Yellow Stone, or go to shoot birds in flight. It is definitely not something you hang around your neck and walk around with. You need to have the dolly to haul it around.

My original intend, or my question, was to replace the 80-400mm with this. Now I have a chance to test it, and loving it, it is definitely no replacement of the good old favorite 80-400mm in terms of versatility and walking-around-with.
It also works extremely well with the Sigma TC-1401.



1cbbce6ea7d1451ca8a1162480b0c76b.jpg


Bob
 
I have a chance to truely tested this lens today. Went to the zoo for some easy targets.

The pros:

1. This lens is supper sharp.

2. The auto focus is so good that it is jaw dropping fast and accurate. The ultra sonic motor is just great. Fast and quiet. It is also extremely accurate. I don't know this is what you should expect in the newer technology (newer lenses). It is so perfect I was lead to believe that there is some kind of computer logic or algorithm that aided the fucus. It seems to be very smart to guess where I want the focus.

The cons:

1. The brightness. That f/6.3 is very noticeably darker than my Nikon 80-400mm f/5.6. I tested this indoor in the bird house where it was dark and I had to strain my eyes when I tried out the manual focusing. I don't know if this is something that would be offset by the excellent auto focus (as I mentioned in the pros section) that I would not need to manual focus as much.

2. The weight. Maybe this is just a natural property of a big lens. For those who claim you can hand hold this lens, you must be one of the Mario brothers. I took it off my monopod and I lasted about 10 minutes when my left arm went numb.

I have yet to test it on BIF shoot but I ran out of time this afternoon.

My preliminary report is that this is an excellent addition to those who want to shoot birds, wildlifes and sport actions. But be prepared to use it on a good heavy duty monopod.

Sigma 150-600mm Sport

Sigma 150-600mm Sport
Just wanted to add a comment on versatility of this lens.

With its weight and bulk, this is definitely a special purpose lens. You take it when you go to Yellow Stone, or go to shoot birds in flight. It is definitely not something you hang around your neck and walk around with. You need to have the dolly to haul it around.

My original intend, or my question, was to replace the 80-400mm with this. Now I have a chance to test it, and loving it, it is definitely no replacement of the good old favorite 80-400mm in terms of versatility and walking-around-with.
It also works extremely well with the Sigma TC-1401.

1cbbce6ea7d1451ca8a1162480b0c76b.jpg


Bob
Agree with you both gentlemen!

--
Tord_2 (at) photographer (dot) net
Mostly Nikon V1, V2, J5, & D600, user
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top