DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

16-35 4L IS vs 16-35 2.8L II?

Started Aug 10, 2016 | Questions thread
cpharm86 Senior Member • Posts: 2,742
Re: 16-35 4L IS vs 16-35 2.8L II?

hotdog321 wrote:

The rumored 16-35 f/2.8L III is sure to be significantly more expensive and heavy in comparison to the 16-35 f/4L IS, though I'm sure Canon will make significant improvements in sharpness compared to the current f/2.8 versions.

You're going to love your new 16-35 f/4L IS. Post pics!

Here are some photos with the 16-35 f/4L IS. I don't think I did the lens justice with my outdoor landscape skills. I have not shot any landscape in a long time I'm usually more involved in events and weddings.

This was handheld at 1/25th sec.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow