DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

The 35mm Q - worth having both 35L and 16-35L?

Started Aug 14, 2016 | Discussions thread
Kaso Veteran Member • Posts: 4,488
Re: The 35mm Q - worth having both 35L and 16-35L?
2

maiaibing wrote:

got the 16-35mm f/4 IS L while waiting for . . . the 35L II

They are two different lenses designed for different applications.

Worth having both? Only you can decide based on your own preferences/priorities.

I would buy a 16-300mm and "have all focal lengths covered" -- but I don't do that. On the other hand, I use a 70-200/2.8L IS II USM, and also a 135/2L and a 100/2.8L Macro.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow