DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

16-35 4L IS vs 16-35 2.8L II?

Started Aug 10, 2016 | Questions thread
David Parsons Forum Member • Posts: 76
Re: 16-35 4L IS vs 16-35 2.8L II?

For landscapes - no reason - you do not need f2.8..

I have the f4L and think it's fabulous. Have never used the 2.8 but all comments I've seen say f4 better unless you really need f2.8....

 David Parsons's gear list:David Parsons's gear list
Canon PowerShot Pro1 Olympus TG-5 Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 6D +8 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow