E-M1 vs. A7II Thoughts

zxaar wrote:

MatsP wrote:

My conclusion from your comparison is that the EM-1 is superior from most aspects except for resolution and high ISO performance.

And dynamic range too.

You are right what he is saying that sony is significantly better that making photos the thing for which one buys camera.

I take it that for you the photo aspect of camera is not so important but for op it seems tk be a big factor.

That's an amazingly good result, remembering that you compare a 16 MP and a 42 MP camera. The only advantages of the A7II are directly related to the sensor resolution and size and not much else. The negative things you list seems to me being mostly related to only a short experience of the EM-1 which of course is very understandable. It takes some time to learn how to set and use an Olympus camera. What many refer to as a complicated menu reflects that the possibilities to individual settings are enormous and it's easy to get wrong if you don't take your time diving into it. Have fun!

I think there are many different types of photographers. Some purely enjoy the experience of taking photos (and may or may not take great photos). Others love the technical aspect, the gear, the image quality, post processing, etc. I probably lean towards this end of the spectrum. And I think most compromise somewhere in the middle with the best gear for them in terms of fit, feel, cost, while still offering great IQ. There is often the argument that m43 is more than enough for great photos, or APS-C is, or full frame is plenty compared to medium format. The truth is great photos can be taken with a cell phone. But everyone has there needs and you have to figure out where you wish to compromise.