DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

E-M1 vs. A7II Thoughts

Started Jul 28, 2016 | Discussions thread
Stazza
Stazza Forum Member • Posts: 98
Re: E-M1 vs. A7II Thoughts
9

SonyArtisan wrote:

  • The high ISO performance of the E-M1 is disappointing. I didn't compare it side-by-side to the Sony but even ISO 3200 is almost unusable for me. It seems at least a stop worse than my old A6000, two stops worse than the A6300, and maybe even slightly more than two stops compared to the A7II. It's about on par with my RX100IV which is disappointing to say the least.

I have both the E-M10 and the A7 II - They each have their own pros and cons - however on the ISO point above, it's important to note that where you are constrained by needing depth of field (e.g. shooting more than one person indoors), then you're limited to using two stops more ISO on the A7 II (e.g. 1600 of MFT, 6400 on A7 II). In these cases, the MFT is significantly better. I also find the IBIS on MFT to be better as well (presumably due to it being easier to stabilise a smaller sensor), which increases the MFT's lead here.

 Stazza's gear list:Stazza's gear list
Sony a7R III Sony FE 85mm F1.8 Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 III Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Tamron 28-200mm F2.8-5.6 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow