Just purchased Olympus E-PL6 coming from Sony? Tips?

SonyArtisan wrote:

ahaslett wrote:

SonyArtisan wrote:

third son wrote:

SonyArtisan wrote:

third son wrote:

SonyArtisan wrote:

BostonC wrote:

IMO the (refurbished) EPL7 is a much better buy than the cheaper EPL6, better build and handling aside, you get the 3-axis IBIS and importantly EFCS (0-sec delay) to reduce/eliminate shutter-shock.

Perhaps, but it is over $100 more and still lacks a viewfinder. I've been having such a hard time deciding on the best value Olympus camera. I've been looking at the EM10, EPL7, and EP5, all about $100-150 more than the EPL6. The problem is there aren't any camera stores nearby that stock these units. The closest means an expensive 2+ hour trip to the city. If I were to go for the EPL7 it is only $350 new from B&H (no tax) where it is $272 reconditioned with tax from Olympus. I went with the EPL6 because it was by far the cheapest and should offer the same IQ as the others which will give me a chance to test Olympus lenses and sensor quality. I figure if I love the quality, size, and weight, I can certainly find a better body that suits my handling/feature needs, perhaps even a flagship model. If not, I can sell everything at a very slight loss.

I disliked the shutter on the EPL6 and only had it for a short time. It does take some nice photos though. I think the EM10 is still the best MFT camera out there with a viewfinder. 3 axis IBIS is more than enough for some stellar shots.

Thanks for the input. What about compared to the EM10 mk ii and EM5 mk ii? I am assuming you meant best for the price. The two mentioned above are surely better, no?

Yes, sorry, I meant to say the EM10 is the best VALUE with a viewfinder (for me anyway) I can say the EM10 (I) is a better camera than the epl6 even though the image quality is on par. I like cameras with viewfinders and dual controls even though I have a GM1 (gonna sell). I sold my EM10 to finance a new EM5II and find it is a small notch higher for what I need. 5 axis IBIS, weather sealed, silent shutter, more function buttons. I love this camera and have no regrets selling my EM10 (well maybe a bit regretful)

The EM10 is very enticing at $280 reconditioned as is the EM5II for ~$650. But I definitely need to get a feel for the IQ/lenses since that's a major priority for me. Then I can seriously think about going for something more expensive if necessary. If I love the output then I will consider the above cameras or even the rumored EM1 mk ii for better handling/functionality. I should be able to chime in with many thoughts by tomorrow or Friday. Thanks

If you are going to get an A7R2, then Samyang 7.5mm fisheye, Panny 20mm 1.7 and Panny 12-32 would be my pick, followed by the Olympus 40-150 Pro.

Andrew

Those are the exact lenses I'm most interested in (minus the Panny 12-32 that I haven't really looked into). I tend to prefer one UWA prime (previously had the APS-C Canon 10-18mm that I always used at 10mm and the Rokinon 12mm f2), one standard prime (my favorite lens ever was the APS-C Sony Zeiss 24mm f1.8), one portrait lens (the Sony 50mm f1.8 and 55mm f1.8 were excellent), and one long-ish zoom, in my case an adapted Canon 55-250mm STM. The 40-150mm f2.8 Pro looks absolutely incredible and the samples/reviews I've seen have me lusting over it.

I think my ideal kit would be the Samyang 7.5mm (or 7-14mm), Panasonic 20mm f1.7, Olympus 45mm f1.8 (or Panasonic 42.5mm f1.2), and Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 pro. Total cost would be around $1700 + up to $1200 more for a better body. A similar Sony setup would be at least $500+ more (going off used prices). It would be interesting to see several systems compared. Something like the A6300 vs. EM5 mk ii with their best native lenses.

I have the 7.5mm and 20mm and both have excellent IQ to my eye.  The 12-32mm is the best small walk around kit lens with very acceptable IQ.  No real view about the 45mm, it's not my focal length.  I have an old FT 50mm f/2 macro and a 50-200SWD, but that's on an EM1.

Andrew