Why would anyone buy a regular Hasselblad or even a Leica with the mirrorless Medium format now?

That's what I was thinking-- wouldn't a very high quality zoom for a MF sensor be extremely large and heavy? I was assuming one of the major advantages of this mirrorless Hasselblad over other MF cameras to be comparatively small size and low weight.
 
I have very little idea considering the increasing specs, IQ and opportunities with MFT or APS-C mirrorless.
 
trust me I am not cavalier in the slightest about lenses I own probably 10k worth of lenses.
that is good :)

Apologies for the choice of words then. I am still not a lover of using adapters though
 
Seems that the new revolutionary mirrorless hasselbald is basically as good as their other cameras, and certainly a notch up from even the beauty of leica and around the same price.
Can someone explain to me a list of pros and cons as a potential buyer whose considered the Leica M but now is very tempted by hasselblad mirrorless? I know the mirrorless system doesnt have many lenses, yet, but that is no concern for me.
Why buy into a new mirrorless mount that might disappear in coming years?

The M-mount line is the strongest argument for the continued existence of Leica, and I'd go so far as to argue that the Typ 262 is a far more appealing camera than the enormous Leica SL.

As far as the new Hasselblad, time will tell how well this new $9,000 camera body works. My guess is that with only contrast autofocus and just two native lenses, it's an unappealing mirrorless system compared to mainstream high megapixel full frame options.
 
Good point. Leica does have the longevity. But hasselblad can easily release a mk2 to address the concerns you have. I think it's moot. I doubt I'll buy a version 1 of the hasselblad, but leica is enticing :)
 
With cameras of this class AF speed is not that important because they are meant for slow careful work, often with manual focus.
 
While I agree with much of your post I still think AF isn't as important with MF where precision and maximum IQ are more important than shooting a BIF or a football player running. Of course I grew up with manual focus. Like all technology there's a tendency to become dependent on it.
 
While I agree with much of your post I still think AF isn't as important with MF where precision and maximum IQ are more important than shooting a BIF or a football player running. Of course I grew up with manual focus. Like all technology there's a tendency to become dependent on it.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top