DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

12-35 2.8 vs 14-140 II - how much better?

Started Jun 27, 2016 | Discussions thread
richj20 Forum Pro • Posts: 10,181
Re: 12-35 2.8 vs 14-140 II - how much better?
3

akjos wrote:

I got G7 and chose 14-140 lens as a kit.

It is great considering size weight and the price bundled with the G7

But i wonder how much better is the 12-35. Is it much sharper

Theoretically, It should be, because it is ideal optically with a 3x zoom ratio, so it's not really a fair comparison with the 14-140mm, a general purpose superzoom. Also, the 12-35mm doesn't have the longer focal lengths of the 14-140mm, so there is nothing to compare in that regard.

Nonetheless, you might be surprised at how well the 14-140mm at 14-35mm compares to the 12-35mm. So, what are you gaining? 12mm, constant f/2.8.

and and does it have the nano coating wow contrast?

Read here:

http://shop.panasonic.com/cameras-and-camcorders/lumix-camera-lenses/H-HS12035.html

If i got it i would still keep the 14-140 II likely (3.5-5.6) for certain situations.

It is a nice all around lens for sure. It gets a great review here:

http://naturalexposures.com/panasonic-lumix-14-140mm-lens-review/

I assume you have specific uses in mind for both lenses, should you get the 12-35mm.

- Richard

-- hide signature --
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow