DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

I think I'm going to jump m4/3's ship because of UltraWideAngle

Started May 21, 2016 | Discussions thread
Siobhan A Senior Member • Posts: 1,857
Davud, your eyes were closed before your OP
2

Davud wrote:

I get it that m4/3 is good, very good but that doesn't mean I am going to close my eyes on other options.

If your eyes were open you would not have cherry picked such a limited example in your OP.

Worse you failed to account for what others pointed out..

"The Pana lens is a much more complex lens design 16 elements in 12 groups (inc. 2x aspherical and 4x ED elements) vs. Sony 10 elements in 8 groups (inc. 3x aspherical & 1xSuper ED elements) which ends up in a much better resolution on the edge of the image."

So if you want blurry and dark low resolution corners, and don't care about anything else, then you made a good choice. With the latest Sony lenses averaging over $1400 each, you can look forward to spending all the money you want.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
108
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow