DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

XF 60mm f/2.4 vs. XF 56mm f/1.2

Started Apr 21, 2016 | Questions thread
dengx Senior Member • Posts: 1,032
Re: XF 60mm f/2.4 vs. XF 56mm f/1.2

Allen Y. wrote:

As you can tell, I'm leaning toward the 60 given it's much lower purchase price (and weight). But a little personal experience from someone in the know would be helpful. Thanks in advance.

Most likely you will be satisfied (or dissatisfied) with both.

Both are on the slow side when it comes to focusing and both are capable of producing great shots.

If you do not need f/1.2 then go with 60mm as it's much cheaper, smaller and sharp from f/2.4.

It also renders a little warmer images than 56 (nothing you cannot change in post though).

I went with 60 this time because it suits me better for the kind of portraits I use it for.

Also consider either new or old 35 - these are fantastic lenses more suited for everyday casual shooting than 56/60 that you might find not using that much. For the price of 56 you can almost have both 60 and 35 anyway.

My last advice is to wait for the discounts from Fuji (they often discount their bodies and lenses - few times a year) if you are planning to buy a new one (though there are plenty of them used in mint condition).

Best regards

 dengx's gear list:dengx's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-H1 Sony a7R IV +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow