Lens for Antarctic Trip

When we went the majority of my shots were on land, only a few were from the ship (whales, seals and some penguins on icebergs.) I just reviewed my website images and the longest I posted was at 200, most were shorter. I'd consider the Oly 4/3 50-200 on your EM1 (I used this) or the Oly 40-150 2.8. We were lucky with the weather but I would want weather sealing if possible as things change quickly there!  I had the 12-40 on my EM5 as well.

Incidentally, I hadn't considered the 100-400 Panny as it's new, that might be a good option as well except it doesn't offer the shorter focal lengths that you may need.

If you want to see shots my website is bobgreenberg9918.zenfolio.com

Have a great trip,

BOB

averacpa wrote:

I am in need of advice from anyone who has been to Antarctica.

I have an upcoming trip early next year and have enough funds for either a Oly 40-150 f2.8 or the Panasonic 100-400. Been waiting to see the results and comments on t he 100-400 lens. I expect mainly to shoot the landscapes, but also penguins, sea lions, and if lucky, whales (this is going to happen either from the ship at a distance or the kayak up close - TG-3 for that). All of the Antarctica/photo sites I have checked the photographers have prefer telephoto lenses in the 100-300 full frame range. Although some would say longer is better, but then they mention weight.

I'll be using both the EM1 and GX7 (backup). My current lens are: Oly 12-40, Pany 45-150 f4-5.6, and 100-300 (which is a good copy; pleased with the results under in the 300mm). I do have other lens (primes and UW). I am also thinking of using a mono-pod with the 100-300 although those same website have said tripods are not likely to be used.

With that in mind, I expect most of my shots if not all to be hand held. I am leaning toward the Oly 40-150 and the TC. as the most useful range and weight combo for this trip since I have the Pany 100-300 (although not weather sealed) for those times I need the extra reach.

Any thoughts or advice?