Razor thin DOF. Why, just why ?

Started Apr 2, 2016 | Discussions thread
Jonathan Brady
Jonathan Brady Veteran Member • Posts: 6,457
You know what, I'm impressed

The difference in effective aperture was only 1.67 stops, so not a huge difference, but still, the results were pretty similar. Sure I noticed some differences, but it wasn't as obvious as I expected. In fact I feel like I noticed more differences between the underexposed image and the properly exposed image (after post-blur).

I think for someone who rarely desires a blurred background, if the background/foreground is simple, and assuming they have the skill and programs to do this, I think it's a viable option for occasional use.

 Jonathan Brady's gear list:Jonathan Brady's gear list
Sony a9 Zeiss Batis 25mm F2 Zeiss Batis 85mm F1.8 Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS Sony FE 100mm F2.8 GM +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow