DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Professionals don't use M4/3?

Started Apr 4, 2016 | Discussions thread
lambert4
lambert4 Senior Member • Posts: 2,335
This debate always makes me ill.
6

I have seen equally gorgeous images from every format of system, i have an aquaintance that shot regularly for NatGeo yeas ago, by years I mean decades.  He recants the switch from film to digital, and has since swapped to an apsc to utilize his aging lens collection.  And raves about the digital age and its quality from all systems, his wife shoots with a Pany Bridge superzoom while along side him on safari, I couldn't choose which prints were which with 100% certainty on his walls.  The prints were all 16x20 or larger.  Likewise I have seen folks toting the latest greatest FX system and produce rubbish.

I shoot micro four thirds and charge professional rates when I do work in the photography realm, it is not my primary income.  I have yet to get a complaint or question about the gear.

it is the photographer not the equipment that makes an image valuable, and sometimes it is as much the subject as either of the items.

congrats on those images, the portraits are compelling and draw the eye straight in.  I never would question the equipment with IQ like that.

-- hide signature --

Here's to learning something new everyday, and remembering it the next.

 lambert4's gear list:lambert4's gear list
Nikon D500 Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F4G ED VR Tamron SP 150-600mm F5-6.3 Di VC USD Nikon 35mm F1.8G ED +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow