Lenses or body

R2D2 wrote:

Christopher2222 wrote:

It is interesting to note that in a speed test that although the 70d does shoot faster bursts it will not capture more frames over 30 sec.

Using the SanDisk extreme pro 95Mb/s 32gb card tests show the 70d capturing only 46 RAW images
while the ......................................................................................T6s capturing ....... 85 RAW images

What this tells us, is that after the buffer is filled there is a longer wait period on the 70d (because of older technology) while it clears it's buffer than there is on the T6s

information found here http://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/canon-70d/fastest-sd-cards/

.

WilbaW wrote:

R2? Would you do a quick test for us?

Hi guys.

I've been using 64 GB (and 32 GB) SanDisk Extreme Pro 95 MB/s UHS-1 cards since I got the camera.

I always get 20 (full size RAW) frames in 3 seconds before slowdown.

The camera will thereafter shoot at a rate of appx 2 FPS ad infinitum.

It takes just under 9 seconds to clear the buffer.

I've posted my results previously...

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53759795

.

I just saw your post WilbaW ( ) and tested again (using the same settings as the guy at CMS).

I got: 20 frames at 7 FPS (until buffer full). ~ 2 FPS thereafter. Just under 9 seconds to clear the buffer.

I also did the "30 second" test and got 68 frames using both methods:

1. hold shutter for 30 seconds.

2. shoot burst, clear buffer, shoot burst, clear buffer, shoot burst and hold shutter.

68 frames each time.

Personally I like to shoot bursts (rather than just shoot continuously at 2 FPS) for the same reasons as WilbaW. People and critters move very fast (even when they're not trying to!). A fast FPS and deep buffer will simply net you more keepers (yeah, wish I had the 1Dx MkII on some occasions!).

R2

Interesting numbers thanks - so the 760D has slower burst speed but clears buffer faster and gets overall better throughput.