Canon EF 70-200 F/4 IS USM - Amazon Trade-in: loose cylinder & Rattle
Re: Canon EF 70-200 F/4 IS USM - Amazon Trade-in: loose cylinder & Rattle
Steve Balcombe wrote:
RogerZoul wrote:
I just received by lens back about an hour and a half ago from Amazon.
I inspected the outside carefully, there were no major cracks or dents.
I could not detect what was described as a loose cylinder. Thus, I have no idea what they meant. I could detect what one might describe as a slight rattle when I shook the lens gently in my hands.
However, once I put it back on my 6D and powered it up, the lens immediately resumed correct operation. The AF works, the focusing works near and far, the zoom function works, MF works. There is nothing about this lens that doesn't work.
My thoughts are that the so-called inspector is simply not competent and he or she would have used the lens on a Canon camera instead of trying to manipulate it off the camera. I suspect that the rattling sound inside must have something to do with the image stabilization system, which must somehow float while the user is handholding the lens. Whatever does that may rattle slightly when the lens is not on the camera and powered. I never shake my lenses looking for rattling noises as I see no reason to do that. Also, I don't think I ever zoom or focus with the lens off the camera, either.
I was hoping that others here would have some experience with this behavior on IS lenses. Several months ago I read a post on facebook from a guy who was having the same issues with a Canon EF 100-400mm Mk2. This fellow even made a video on it. It was hard to believe how his brand new lens was behaving but it righted itself once he put it back on a camera. I would post a link here but I cannot seen to find the post or the video now.
I hope this experience will help someone else down the road and I still would like to see some discussion on this possible behaivor of these IS lenses.
The problem - not necessarily with your lens, but in general - is that if you remove the lens from the body before the IS system has powered down, it can leave the IS group unparked and free to rattle around. It can be quite disconcerting, but if you then attach it to a body and power up, it immediately works perfectly.
Maybe the 'inspector' attached it to a body, checked that it was working (it was), then working quickly they removed it and shook it - whereupon it rattled.
That is very believable..I'm certain I didn't know that...but I wonder why he would do that if he knows the group could become unparked? Do you know if Canon has any written description of this on a website?
Thanks.
Canon EOS R5
Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS II USM
Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro
Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM
Canon RF 800mm F11 IS STM
+31 more
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2015
|
1 |
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2015
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
We're Noct messing around with this review.
Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow!
The Sony ZV-E1 is the company's latest vlogging-focused camera: a full-frame mirrorless camera based the FX3/a7S III sensor, aimed at YouTubers and 'creators' looking to go pro.
The Sony ZV-E1 is a full frame camera targeting YouTubers. Chris and Jordan are Youtubers, what do they think?
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.