tnphoto wrote:
That didn't work on my Panny GX7. I renamed 130_PANA on my Mac, then formatted the card in the camera and shot another image. The folder renamed itself to 130_PANA.
A long time since I fiddled with my LX3 but I did find then there was no easy way except the method on my page http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~parsog/panasonic/24-fileno.html
From vague memory it had to have all the intervening folders present before it would make a new folder with a higher number. It always involved taking a shot then renaming the shot on the card in the camera to xxxx0999, then take another shot to force the creation of a new folder, then rename that shot to xxxx0999 and take another shot and so on.
Of course since then there may have been additions to the file handling firmware, is there some menu item to create a new folder on the card?
Aha! Found it! On my LX3 there is a No. Reset item in the Setup menu, this makes the next shot taken be 0001 and creates a new folder for it. All Panasonic have this menu item. Ignorant me, I could have used that years ago when I wrote that page.
So here's the real way to increase folder numbers properly up to where you need them.
- Freshly formatted card in and take one shot (that should preserve the folder number).
- Setup Menu - No. Reset - Yes - OK
- Take a shot, a new higher number folder is created.
- Go back to step 2 and keep looping until the folder number is up where you need it.
So it's still not easy, but easier than my page on the LX3, that needs a re-write.
If you do step 2 on the freshly formatted card without a shot on it then the file system goes back to 100-0001, - well, it does on my LX3.
To see the folder number created then review the shot and see on the right the number during this exercise ..... 101-0001, next would be 102-0001, then 103-0001 as you keep looping the above instructions.
Now dammit, I have to take my LX3 back to 109-0001 as I reset the whole darn file numbering during this try.
Summary - thank heavens I use Olympus, they have file numbering and naming sorted nicely. Panasonic is a bit primitive in that regard, sorry folks.
Regards.... Guy