Wide angled lens for mountains?

Dheorl wrote:

Gary from Seattle wrote:

rashid7 wrote:

Gary from Seattle wrote:

I last did a trek around Manaslu in 1999 with my film camera and lenses 20, 35, 55, 105 and 180. I mostly used the 105 and 180 for cultural shots of the local people. The lenses from 20 to 55 were what I used for the vast majority of my mountain scenery shots. I carried this kit plus at that time plus a 5 lb. tripod throughout the 22 day 200 mile journey. With m4/3 a much lighter tripod will suffice. If you are going with porters, which I would recommend both for convenience but also culturally your pack needn't be heavy. Yours could easily weigh less than 15 pounds, perhaps even ten.

There is not only a great deal of relief to the snow-capped peaks but the mountains are very large, extensive. The width is valuable to encompass the great height and breadth of scenery.

We fall into 2 main camps re gear on the trail. I m of the persuasion that ultralight is nirvana. I am a helicopter pilot, and an ultra-light back packer, and I DETEST carrying too much. I find it robs me of the joy of going foot-loose and fancy-free. By being ruthless in slashing weight, I go further w/ much greater enjoyment.

I love my FF Nikon & glass, but definitely not on the trail!

i am very impressed by you Gary.

I suppose porters (or your personal lama) might change the equation. (Ansel Adams used pack mules)

But it can't be feasible to have them constantly at your side on the trail. (?)

We used porters to carry camp and food (there were no guest houses at the time), but even today I would use porters to support the local economy but also for cultural enrichment of my trip. I carried all the camera gear on my back as I did not feel it fair to so burden the porters.

Out of curiosity why do you advocate the use of porters so much. I understand it can be fun to have some locals around to get to know but from what I've heard as much as it might enrich their economy they are also hugely underpaid for dangerous, sporadic jobs. It's a business which is obviously potentially beneficial to the communities, but I feel along with any recommendation to use porters there should be a huge caveat about how they are hired and through whom.

Sorry, but the pay is much better than other local jobs. The vast majority of Nepalis grow up in a rural setting but are in rather large families; not all can inherit the same small sustaining plot of land. So, the other siblings go to Katmandu, where there are no jobs. And being a porter (not a Sherpa) is not a risky job. Support should be hired through reputable local companies and the help should be (and is typically) well tipped.

I just completed a ten day trip to the Rockies last week. I carried the EM-1 with 12-40, 35-100 (the 40-150 is too heavy and large), and the 8mm on all day hikes, the longest of which was 27-28 km on and off trail and with photography it worked out to an 8 hour day. If I am going to the best places I want to have the best camera gear. On certain trips, depending on the scenery, I leave the 35-100 behind.

I feel that should be changed to the best camera gear you can be bothered to carry but hey ho, now I'm just picking hairs because I disagree with what I'm strongly getting is a "my way is the only way" sort of attitude.

"my way is the only way" Which is exactly what I get from you   , but you may have trouble seeing that.

I also backpacked all summer with camera gear selected for each individual trip. The big item is the tripod. If I do not envision shooting astro and have rocks to set the camera on, I carry only a table top 8 Oz. tripod.