The Creative Vision Hoax in Nature Photography

Started Mar 18, 2015 | Discussions thread
davebreal
OP davebreal Regular Member • Posts: 312
Re: Yep, lots of people went right off, Dave

Hen3ry wrote:

davebreal wrote:

The majority of responses in this thread (mine) have nothing to do with the original topic.

As I've stated, the problem it is the many photographers claim that heavy post-processing results closely resemble what their eyes perceived. I will still back my argument that the "standard picture style" on my Canon cameras looks very much like what my own optical nerves process. Slightly less DR? Yes. I sure as heck don't see cartoons, artifacts, or halos when I'm out hiking though.

They missed your point. Or perhaps they got your point and didn't like it.

And some of them might have some interesting rations tucked into their packs when they go hiking!

Loved your sunset; really excellent picture.

-- hide signature --

Geoffrey Heard
Down and out in Rabaul in the South Pacific
http://rabaulpng.com/we-are-all-traveling-throug/i-waited-51-years-for-tavur.html

Thanks Henry, I'm glad at least a few people "get" my opinion.

For what it's worth, I think any form of post-processing is fair game so long as the editor isn't trying to sell everything as "true to the human eye".  I have come across that often on forums and in Facebook photo sharing groups.

-- hide signature --
 davebreal's gear list:davebreal's gear list
Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 60D Olympus PEN E-PL3 Canon EOS M +19 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tko
tko
tko
tex
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow