DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

35mm lens poll.

Started Aug 28, 2015 | Polls thread
OP Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 45,641
Re: Yikes!

J A C S wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

Abu Mahendra wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

Suppose you were in the market for a lens that covered the 35mm focal length. Which would you choose:

  • Canon 35 / 1.4L II ($1799, 3.2 x 4.2 inches, 760g)
  • Sigma 35 / 1.4A ($799, 3.1 x 4.8 inches, 811g)
  • Canon 35 / 2 IS ($599, 3.1 x 2.5 inches, 335g)
  • Another 35mm prime (please specify)
  • A zoom that covered the 35mm focal length (please specify)

Thanks for participating!

The weight of the Sigma is incorrect. It is not 811 grams, but rather 665 grams.

Thanks for the correction! I have no idea why I wrote 811 grams. Weird!

If the Sigma 50A is any indication, better IQ means more weight (?).

I expect the 35 / 1.4L II to perform better, IQ-wise, than the 35 / 1.4A.  How much better, of course, will be seen, hopefully, in a side-by-side comparison such as this one comparing the 50 / 1.2L and 50 / 1.4A.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow