70-200mm f/2.8G VR II alternatives - weight

Started Jul 17, 2015 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
carlosvitor Regular Member • Posts: 108
70-200mm f/2.8G VR II alternatives - weight

Hello,

I'm thinking on buying a 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II for indoors events, outdoors portraits (couple, kids, family) and eventually taking photos of kids playing sports or dancing at an auditorium, for example.

For walking around lens, I use a 35mm or 50mm f/1.8G. I prefer them over a 24-70mm f/2.8G because of their light weight and wider aperture. Up to now I have no problems using prime lenses instead a standard zoom for framing. But for longer focal length, I don't know if it's better using a zoom lens, and that's why I'm considering a 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II and its 1.5kg.

Lighter alternatives lenses: 85mm f/1.8G, 105mm f/2.8G VR, 135mm DC, 70-200mm f/4G, etc.

Each one has their compromises: not long enough, slower AF, no VR, or not fast enough.

I'd like to know if somebody has had any problem dealing with the 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II weight (and when using two cameras on a double Black Rapid). I'm young but not a big guy, so I'm worried hurting my back or getting a tendinitis.

Thank you!

 carlosvitor's gear list:carlosvitor's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Sony a9 Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow