Pentax Quality Control Strikes Again

Started Apr 23, 2015 | Discussions thread
awaldram
awaldram Forum Pro • Posts: 13,270
Re: Pentax Quality Control Strikes Again
1

DAVID MANZE wrote:

awaldram wrote:

DAVID MANZE wrote:

awaldram wrote:

Joseph Tainter wrote:

I just got a DA 16-85. As with any new Pentax lens, I immediately took it out for a brick wall test. Sure enough, it is optically decentered, with bad weakness on the right side.

That's my second bad Pentax lens (out of two new lenses purchased) since last summer.

It's going back.

Joe

I think Joe your version of acceptable is not the same as Pentax's , This isn't meant as a criticism just a fact.

Joe's lens was not tested optically........they don't check every lens optically just an occasional sample! . there's just a quick mechanical check.

...........so it comes off the line and goes into the box ...

So how would Pentax have known whether it was good or not?......

You perhaps are not aware how manufacturing works in the modern age

The only reason 'occasional' lens are checked is to ensure the lens are coming off the manufacturing line within 'acceptable defined limits. It has nothing todo with checking the lens itself (it doesn’t get a 'checked' stamp)

Manufacturing plants use designs and build technique to achieve a set quality .... they then randomly check the plant is hitting that quality.

This doesn't mean things can't go wrong but is unlikely and even it it does not for an appreciable run before detected.

The company I work for has a 2% limit for failing memory simms , One of the manufacturers we 'badge' has a 5% limit consequently we QC every simm from this manufacturer so that we can deliver on our 'promise' with our label.

The same applies to Joe even though it's manufacturer to user, Pentax obviously have a lower standard than Joe therefore the only way Joe can be sure to get 'what he requires' is to test every lens he buys, As his standard is greater than the manufacturers a good proportion will fail his test.

This is because as designed they were never meant to pass his test hence he needs the better ones off the production run rather than average.

Pentax on the other hand couldn't care less they set their 'standards' to keep returns and warranty repairs to an acceptable level and if they can put two milk bottoms on a pepsi can and sell it for £1000 with low return they will.

To assume otherwise shows a level of brand blindness that is the true 'fanboy state' to believe Pentax make lens as a service to their users rather than make money !!! and leads to the disillusioned rants we often see in these forums ..... hell has no fury like pentaxian  spurned

-- hide signature --

Dave's clichés

 awaldram's gear list:awaldram's gear list
Pentax K-x Pentax Q Olympus PEN E-PM2 Pentax Q7 Pentax K-3 +17 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow