I thought the Q was very clever, now Pentax needs a bigger mirror-less

Started Mar 23, 2015 | Discussions thread
paulkienitz
paulkienitz Veteran Member • Posts: 5,294
Re: Ill tell you what I think...now

Daedbird wrote:

• 1" sensor - Having used a Sony RX10, and that is a little dynamo. Its great for video, and love the still quality. I really think that unless its like a rugged niche camera, anything less than 1" and you might as well use your cellphone.

In my experience, there are a lot of practical circumstances where a Q can vastly outperform a phone.  The gap is huge.  Like, I stick a DA 50/1.8 on my Q and I've got a basic telephoto birding rig that's pocketable.  Without that, I've occasionally had to resort to holding my phone up to a binocular, and the shortfall between that and the Q is way bigger than the difference between the Q and the K-3.  (Nowadays I don't have to worry about such awfulness anymore, as my phone's camera is broken.)

-- hide signature --

"A good photograph is knowing where to stand." -- Ansel

 paulkienitz's gear list:paulkienitz's gear list
Pentax Q Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA 55-300mm F4.0-5.8 ED Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM Samyang 8mm F3.5 Aspherical IF MC Fisheye +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ogl
ogl
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow