I fancy buying one too.
however I'm purely a JPEG shooter and have read that jpegs are not the best.
also how's the auto faces speed?
also been eyeing up a Sony a6000 & omd e-m10 both with kit lenses for a while.
ive been a Fuji x shooter for the past few years but fancy something different
I have the Nikon Coolpix A, which specs out very much the same, is a bit smaller and has a few less features. But photo quality is very similar. The GR is faster, but the 'A' is excellent for JPEGS. The 'A'is also cheaper to buy, if you can find one for sale.
The 'A' can't match the GR's monochrome output, 3 user presets (remembering all settings), battery life, customisability, lighter weight, 'stealth' factor, buffer, Eye-fi support, USB charging, one-handed usage ergonomics, RGBW screen, lens sharpness, snap focus...
It does look a bit fancier though
3 user presets would be more useful if the GR's JPEGS were better.
The GR's Jpegs are neutral. 98% saturation vs the 'A's (typical) 110% 'A.' Jpegs are subjective and can easily be tailored using the in-camera settings.
In addition the GR can store a total of 6 (3 on the dial, + 3 more that can be swapped out at will)
user-named presets, RAW or Jpeg or both. The 'A's 2 user presets are less useful, as they don't retain all camera settings, apparently.
lighter weight...I thought the A is lighter.
GR 245 g vs 'A' 299 g. That's almost 20% lighter, not insignificant in such small cameras. My RX100Mk11 is 281g, and noticeably more hefty than the GR in hand.
The GR is slightly longer and taller than the A, but also thinner, making the in-pocket experience with the rubber handgrip almost perfect.
USB charging? I prefer having a charger.
These days USB can be topped up from just about anywhere in the field. Subjective also yes.
Lens sharpness...that's debatable.
Many lenses can be considered sharp stopped down and/or in the centre. The 'A' is very, very good. However the GR's lens is ridiculously sharp edge-to-edge even wide open, and many consider it to be in the Leica/Zeiss prime class.
Fancier? I prefer the GR look, although it's bigger.
Haha I meant because the Nikon has the shiny metal bits it looks a bit classier. (to me)
Monochrome look? For B & W shooting, I like my old LX-3....very magic for that. (Don't like it's colors.)
No doubt about this one. The GR is out on it's own for insanely beautiful monochromes. Here's just one look at this:
Ricoh GR vs. Leica Monochrom
~
No doubt the 'A' is a fantastic camera designed for punchy OOC Jpeg output. Made even more attractive by the recent price cuts. I'm just very lucky that I stumbled upon the GR before the 'A' price drops hit down under, because using the GR is a revelatory experience.
You really have to try one to comprehend the phenomenal ergonomics and interface; it is so different from any other camera that I have used, yet feels completely natural. Not much surprise, considering it has been honed from a decade of GR camera heritage (with 4 to 5 firmware updates
per camera. The GR is on V 4.0). My Rx100Mk11 feels quite ungainly now, despite all it's Sony magic tricks.
Without doubt, it's the best and most fun camera I have ever owned.
It's a sleeper and you really should try to get your hands on one Steve!
~
PS The cream on the cake is that I just discovered that my RX100Mk11 Magfilter fits perfectly on the GR. I can pop on any filter or polariser with no bulky adapter! Yay!
http://mogopod.com/products/magfilter