Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Started Jul 4, 2014 | Discussions thread
andrewdaviesphotography Junior Member • Posts: 45
Re: Love note to the nit pickers.

Just looking at reviews and came across this , many thanks to the OP for the post. To those ' nit pickers' this is the simple truth.

The test was a valid head to head comparison of the two lenses in real world shooting and the F4IS is clearly better , although there may be some who are annoyed and own the 2.8 so will go all out with clever explanations as to why the tests are invalid - who cares- on you go.

In reality when i am photographing a wedding or event with this lens i am hardly going to stop and work out my hyperfocal distance or how close to focus and thereby miss the shot , i expect the focus to be where i put it and as much of the shot to be sharp as possible , this lens clearly delivers that, the 2.8 version does not.

Newcastle Wedding Commercial and Landscape Photography

 andrewdaviesphotography's gear list:andrewdaviesphotography's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
dil
dil
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow