DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Using OM lens with E-PM2 newbie question

Started Jan 17, 2015 | Questions thread
OP Jhumroo Senior Member • Posts: 2,194
Re: hindesite

hindesite wrote:

2raj wrote:

hindesite wrote:

The OM 50/1.8 is very good on m4/3, I have used a couple (with different results) on both an E-P1 and G6. Not as sharp as the 45/1.8, nor as convenient, but definitely useful. And cheap.

Would you recommend the OM 50/1.8 over other brand (Nikon, Canon etc.) lenses to use with the E-PM2?

The OM lens feels and looks nice, but I also have Helios 44K-4 58/2, Canon 50/1.8, Nikon 55/2.8 Micro Nikkor, Nikon 50/1.8, Pentax 50/1.4 and OM 50/3.5 Macro. Cost varied from about $50 to $5 or $0 for most of them.

Of the standard 50mm lenses, it really comes down to what you are used to handling, they are somewhat similar though of course the macro lenses and the Helios are different.

The OM lenses have the aperture ring on the front of the lens, can be confusing for some; also Nikon bayonet is braindead and backwards. Canon FD mount is the subject of quite a few questions in this forum, it is a bit complicated. Adapters are so cheap it is reasonable to leave them permanently attached to your favourite lenses.

The big deal with these lenses is stay clear of fungus and you should be right.

The main problem you will have is judging focus, with no EVF and no focus peaking you will need to use magnified view which wasn't implemented at all well on the E-P1; maybe it is better on the E-PM2 (it isn't good on the E-PM1, either).

Thanks for the tip. I'll try to program one of the buttons to Zoom to help with manual focussing.

On the E-P1 I had to be in the correct display mode, press the centre button, focus then press the centre button to compose. Very tedious. Anything would be an improvement, and the G6 was more than that - it makes using MF lenses a delight.

Pretty much any cheap adapter will do, the advantage f the OM lenses is that the adapter don't need any release button or moving parts. I prefer adapters with tripod mounts, so they can support heavier lenses without straining the camera.

So, you think going with the $10 adapter over more expensive ones is ok?

I've never bought an expensive adapter and been happy with what I have received and the results I have got.

Thanks for all the great tips and recommendations. It's much appreciated.

-- hide signature --

Just a pixelpusher with a love of photography

 Jhumroo's gear list:Jhumroo's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F40fd Olympus E-M5 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 II R Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 II Olympus 14-150 F4-5.6 II
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow