DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon G10 Revisited

Started Jan 10, 2015 | Discussions thread
rkhndjr Forum Pro • Posts: 13,082
Re: Canon G10 Revisited

AdamT wrote:

Agreed 100% - it took the Original G1X to tear the G10 from my hands as the feeble replacements (G11, G12 etc) failed to do so . yes they`re "cleaner" but both a lot lower in resolution (even the 12Mp ones) as well as softer at pixel level in RAW . also the G10's JPG engine is far more "honest" (smears less) at all ISOs so produces a more photographic image ..

OK, After getting the G1X (Mk1 with the full 14Mp, proper dials, OVF and the slow but pretty perfect lens) the G10 was totally redundant but it was supremely underrated, made the G11,12,15,16 look too much of a compromise to get high ISOs better and it took a near APS-C sensor to beat it

Just wanted to say HI to Adam and that I have more pics from a G10 than any of my many other cameras.Loved that jewel and wish I had another.

.

-- hide signature --

** Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist **

-- hide signature --

Russell Smith
Eternity was in that moment.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
FD
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow