New Canon SX710 HS. More Megapixels....
LionelA
•
Junior Member
•
Posts: 30
Re: Link..
BarnET wrote:
Steen Bay wrote:
BarnET wrote:
Steen Bay wrote:
BarnET wrote:
G-D wrote:
Lisetta1 wrote:
More megapixels. Same sensor. Same boring old Canon.
Eh, how can it be the same sensor when it has 4 extra megapixels, 20 iso. 16? Don't get your point.
We haven't seen even one single sample or review of these cams but already they're being written off as rubbish. I don't understand that attitude.
Easy.
The sensor is 20mp bsi cmos at 1/2.3 inch
We all know that sensor. It's made by Sony and it used in most of their compacts and xperia phones. Then Canon seems to do their best to make the slowest aperture lenses in it's class.
This sensor has very small pixels so it needs a lot of light. in a xperia phone with a F2.2 primes lens. no worries. On a compact camera from brand that people expect more off the lens only goes to f7 at the long end. That means the Compact is a LOT worse then a Sony smartphone.
SX710 is f/3.2 at the wide end, and I'm pretty sure it's better at the long end than a Sony smartphone using 30x digital zoom. Agree though that 20mp probably is a bit over the top.
I am sure the panasonic with it's faster lens and lower MP sensor will be better then the Canon at the long end.
ZS50 is f/3.3-6.4 and SX710 is f/3.2-6.9, so pretty much the same.
the canon is 1/3rd stop slower. Which means it has to use a higher ISO to compensate.
Then the Panasonic has a sensor with less pixels which means larger pixels.
It wins. the question is whether it will be significant
what about color reproduction and Image Stability? canon usually beats panasonic in this categories even on P&S, image stability makes a lot of difference when shutter speed is slow....also for landscape shooting at the wide end usually more MP is better even with small sensors.
The VF and raw support makes the panasonic very interesting
Then it has a viewfinder and a tiltscreen
Yes, that gives ZS60 an advantage (at least IMO. Much prefer cameras with an EVF).
So apples to apples the Canon makes no sense.
And Apples to oranges the Phone is better at the wide-end.
Maybe. Depends on the quality of the lens (and processing, etc.)
Well we can be sure that neither the Panasonic nor the Canon will be significantly better then a device everyone already owns at the wide-end.
Which is the biggest threat to this market. People don't see the difference. since there isn't a significant difference. So unless you offer some nice functionality(panasonic did with the viewfinder)
you wil get a very tough time selling them.
Panasonic decided to decrease the mp count to 12 in their top of the line ZS/TZ. I think all enthusiasts agree that less in this case equals more.
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
1 |
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 7, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 7, 2015
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
