DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Samsung 16-50mm F2-2.8 ED OSS worth buying for portraits?

Started Jan 4, 2015 | Questions thread
OP cyberpi1 Contributing Member • Posts: 504
Re: Samsung 16-50mm F2-2.8 ED OSS worth buying for portraits?
2

wpstl wrote:

It would be a fine choice for group shots and full length portraits but I'd want a little longer for head and shoulder type portraits.

I'm going to use it mostly for full lenth portraits. For head and shoulder portraits I already have brilliant 85mm f/1.4 )

jennyrae, thanks for a link!

I've found a lot pictures here http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=slr_review&divpage=1&no=411 but no portraits.

 cyberpi1's gear list:cyberpi1's gear list
Pentax 645Z Canon EOS R5 Sony ZV-E10 Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Pentax smc D FA 645 55mm F2.8 AL (IF) SDM AW +6 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow