DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

MZ 40-150 f2.8 vs ZD 50-200mm SWD - Non-Prefocused S-AF Comparison

Started Nov 24, 2014 | Discussions thread
drj3 Forum Pro • Posts: 12,632
Re: MZ 40-150 f2.8 vs ZD 50-200mm SWD - Non-Prefocused S-AF Comparison

tradesmith45 wrote:

Martin.au wrote:

tradesmith45 wrote:

Enzojz wrote:

Another question...I know with continous-shoot-IS-on, 50-200SWD will drop "fps" when the aperture is not at maximal, does this problem exists on 40-150 PRO? thanks!

The manual says all lens will slow in L Sequential Mode to 3.5 fps if IS is on.

Which manual? The E-M1 doesn't slow down with IBIS on with any of the M4/3s lenses I have

Looks like I got the source for this wrong. This is what is stated on P 23 of biofos.com article on the E-M1 settings in paragraphs 4c (iv) & 4c (v).

That said, I spent lots of time searching the Oly manual & can't find anything on this question either way - sorry for my confusion. Knew I had read it somewhere.

My ZD300 definitely slows lots in L sequential when IS is enabled.

If you go into the E-M1 camera Menu (Cog C) Image Stabilization - On - and hit the right arrow the Info says - "Image stabilization activated to prioritize stable image.  Continuous shooting speed may be affected."

-- hide signature --

drj3

 drj3's gear list:drj3's gear list
Olympus E-510 Olympus E-5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus E-M1 II +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow