DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Why has Canon Abandoned F/2.8?

Started Nov 18, 2014 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 45,641
Simply because...
6

DavidNJ100 wrote:

A basic set of lenses consists of three zooms. For Nikon those were 12-24, 24-70, and 70-200 F2.8 zooms. For Canon they have been a 16-35, 24-70, and 70-200 F2.8 zooms. In both cases only the 70-200 have IS. Tamron and Sigma have 24-70 and 70-200 F2.8 zooms. Tamron has a 15-30 zoom coming out early next year.

Canon introduced the 70-200 in 2010 and the 24-70 in 2012 which makes them much newer than Nikon's lenses which date from 2007-2009. The two Tamron's on the market are from 2012.

Then in 2014 Canon introduced 16-35/4L IS. And it now appears we are moments from seeing a new 11-24/4L in early 2015. Canon's 16-35/2.8 dates from 2007.

Have Canon abandoned fast super wide angle lenses? For video and activities that have motion, including wedding photography, the shutter speed can't be dropped below 1/50th (video) or 1/80th second or so. Low light is often an issue.

Is Canon abandoning F2.8 under the assumption that a higher ISO can compensate? Do they expect their future cameras to have better high ISO performance?

...Canon has released an update for the 17-40 / 4L in the form of a 16-35 / 4L IS before an update to the 16-35 / 2.8L, and are going to release an 11-24 / 4L, doesn't mean that they've abandoned f/2.8 on UWA.  It just means that they felt the f/4 lenses should come first.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow