Re: G1X MKII - Why the lack of buzz?
rgleich wrote:
Looking into an Upgrade for my lost/stolen G9 - I liked the G9, but I am ready to move-up to something better / more versatile in the Image Quality & Available Light departments.
I'm not sure if I want to lug-around a bunch of different lenses -
If I do, I will probably save-up and jump-ship to Fujifilm X-T1 and enroll in some classes / read a book or two.
If I don't - I have also been considering the Sony RX10, which seems to be a REALLY nice all-rounder, but it has been around for almost a year and I fear that if I plunk-down around a grand, they will inevitibly release the improved version the day after...
I was initially enthralled with previews / reviews of G1X MKII - After using the G9, the learning curve would have been less steep.
However - there seems to be a general lack of "buzz" about this camera. The specs appeared to be good, but was it's thunder stolen by the rapid succession of Sony RX100-I-II-III releases?
It seems that in the Milwaukee area - NONE of even the most ardent Canon Camera Shops have stocked it, so I have yet to get my grubby paws on one. (Maybe due to lackluster sales of Original G1X - which is STILL in stock at several stores, but who wants to buy a "new" camera that is that "long-in-the-tooth" and still has noted shortcomings, which have supposedly been corrected in the NEW version?...)
On paper - it sounded like a WINNER
So, why the seeming lack of interest?
Any input from actual G1X MKII owners would also be appreciated
I went from the G6 to the mk2. Maybe I am enamored by the technological advances, but I am enamored nonetheless. It is nothing short of a fantastic camera.
After a a couple thousand pictures, I do have one complaint. It is slow to move from Av priority to manual. This comes into play about 5 - 10% of the time for me, so it is a real issue. That said, they will have to pry it out of my hands after I die