Nikon 1.8g's vs Sigma 1.4 Art Series

Started Aug 16, 2014 | Discussions thread
Stacey_K
Stacey_K Veteran Member • Posts: 8,373
Re: 28, 35 and 85

Shaun_Nyc wrote:

Stacey_K wrote:

Shaun_Nyc wrote:

Stacey_K wrote:

Shaun_Nyc wrote:

Stacey_K wrote:

But that said, I can't say I've ever captured a "wow" image with it either.

Well that's dependent on the photographer

Interesting I -have- gotten "wow" images with the 58 and also with the 17-70 sigma at 50mm...

Well, that's purely your opinion isn't it ?

In any case tens of thousands of "wow" images have been shot w cheap 50 1.8's from both Nikon & Canon, go figure..

Translation: Let me insult your ability as a photographer and then put a smiley face after it so it's OK.

Sorry you feel that way, anyway what I said is accurate. Tens of thousands of great images have been made with the 50 1.8 plastic fantastic from both camps.

http://www.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=16

http://www.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=42&perpage=12&focal_min=none&focal_max=none&aperture_min=none&aperture_max=none&res=3

Thanks you for making my point, with both lenses, first two pages any shot with a even slightly busy background shot more open than f5.6 displays what I find when shooting with this lens. You might as well just shoot with the kit zoom at f8. And if you call that "wow"....

-- hide signature --

Stacey

 Stacey_K's gear list:Stacey_K's gear list
Nikon D200 Nikon D700 Nikon D7000 Nikon D800 Sony Alpha a7 +16 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
9ck
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
xtm
9ck
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow