Comparison of: Zeiss Otus, Sigma 50 Art, Nikkor 58G, Nikkor 50/1.4G, Nikkor 50/1.8G

Started Aug 10, 2014 | Discussions thread
Rick_Hunter Senior Member • Posts: 1,021
Re: Comparison of: Zeiss Otus, Sigma 50 Art, Nikkor 58G, Nikkor 50/1.4G, Nikkor 50/1.8G
1

coudet wrote:

Rick_Hunter wrote:

Are you serious? Take a look at the pictures on flickr.

https://www.flickr.com/groups/cv58nokton/

Thank you for the link, Rick. I do appreciate you doing the legwork for me.

This is an example from the first page of that link. Take a peek at upper left corner. And this is F/2.8, I'd hate to see what this scene would look like wide open.

If this lens does not have a nice bokeh, then what does?

You have really low standards for what makes nice bokeh.

If you want nasty bokeh go for nikkor 35/1.8 dx or nikkor 50/1.8 G - that's nasty bokeh.

If a lens produces good looking bokeh 90% of the time I call it "good bokeh lens" but you call it bad bokeh lens.

So if that's a bad bokeh lens... How would you call a 50/1.8G or a 35/1.8 dx??? Pieces of crap?

I hate arguing with people like you that have to be right at any cost, so I won't respond any more to your posts.

 Rick_Hunter's gear list:Rick_Hunter's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Nikon D600 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
xtm
xtm
xtm
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow