question about filters and IQ

Started Aug 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
scorrpio Veteran Member • Posts: 3,595
Re: question about filters and IQ

stevo23 wrote:

scorrpio wrote:

Sir Canon wrote:

yes but a shattered front element costs way more.

So you're arguing against a filter, but giving good reasons to buy one here.

I always make a concession for truly hazardous conditions.  Or cases where filter is needed to properly seal a lens (i.e. 50 f/1.2L) AND environmental sealing is necessary - to protect the lens mechanism, not the front element. Btw, never used UV filters at beaches, even in a wind. No regrets.   I am a realist.  If I am doing demolition or felling a tree, I wear a hardhat.   But I don't wear one 24/7 'just in case'.   And I consider my head a wee bit more valuable than my glass.   Then again, resale value is not a consideration here.  If I ever need to take up close pictures of sand-blasting or spray-painting, most  likely I will rig some sort of box with a glass or lexan window.

As to getting an occasional ding or scratch? A hood will prevent vast majority of those, and as to how a scratched lens performs, see this:

Forget performance, resale value goes in the toilet. Not to mention the myriad of things that can actually ruin performance.

I buy my lenses for use, not for resale.   And in a case where I did sell after an upgrade, not using a filter didn't cost me at all.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow