12-32 vs 14-42 (ii) vs 14-45

Started Mar 18, 2014 | Discussions thread
eques Senior Member • Posts: 2,923
Re: 12-32 vs 14-42 (ii) vs 14-45

I have been reading a lot about these lenses.

One of my sources is slrgear, where the all the 4 standard zooms have been tested, e.g.


The 2,8/12-25 seems to have soft corners at distances  from 15m to infinity, which should make it less suited for landscapes. See here:


Always keep in mind, that all reviews using test charts (LensTip, SLRgear, Photozone) test the lenses at relatively short distances. And I suspect, lenses are constructed to yield the best results with test charts. So these results can not necessarily be used for distances near infinity.

My experiences: I have been very pleased with the results of the 14-45 until I got the 1,7/20. So I hardly ever used the zoom any more for more than a year. This spring I tried the Sigma dp1 and did some very unscientific comparison of my lenses. I found out, that the 14-45 is as good as the 20mm, after all. Quite happy with this result I was very happy with the convenience of the zoom and used the 14-45 for most of the 2500 pictures I took in my spring holidays. The results were disappointing and I banned the zoom lens again. The 1,7/20 is visibly sharper for landscapes.


 eques's gear list:eques's gear list
Ricoh GR Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow