Q Looses the 3-D of the M?

Started Jul 23, 2014 | Discussions thread
Roland Karlsson Forum Pro • Posts: 27,491
Re: what's 3-D?

jennyrae wrote:

a lot of comparisons made already and each time, it is tell-tale even with blind test, unless if you make or drastically change Foveon pictures to look worse. but if you try to improve Bayer pictures to level of Foveon, Bayer can only do so much and not without problems or consequences. replication by Bayer is not even to level of Quattro to Merrill or Quattro to classic Foveon.

I have not really seen comparisons tests between Bayer and Foveon cameras where the 3D effect is without doubt proven. I believe it is real. But, that is mainly based upon theory and a number of nice examples I have seen. I might just imagine it to be true.

 Roland Karlsson's gear list:Roland Karlsson's gear list
Sigma DP3 Merrill Sigma dp2 Quattro Sony RX100 III Pentax K-3 Pentax K-1 +14 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow